It’s with some fascination if not repulsion that Whatiffers can observe bullying by standing committee chairmen continuing unabated on the mayor’s watch.
Cr Thomson’s historical on camera stunts of addressing or referring to Cr Vandervis as “my good friend” are, how shall I say, unchaste and deceptive in the context of what follows below.
![Cat Whisperer by Goodwyn [www.toonpool.com] tweaked 1](https://dunedinstadium.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/cat-whisperer-by-goodwyn-www-toonpool-com-tweaked-1.jpg?w=500&h=158)
Two emails received tonight.
—
Received from Lee Vandervis
Wed, 16 Sep 2015 at 9:26 p.m.
█ Message: Differing Councillor views that may be of interest.
Cheers, Lee
—
—— Forwarded Message
From: Lee Vandervis
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:41:19 +1200
To: Richard Thomson, Grace Ockwell, Sue Bidrose, Sandy Graham
Cc: Dave Cull, Kate Wilson, Chris Staynes, Jinty MacTavish, David Benson-Pope, Hilary Calvert, Aaron Hawkins, Mike Lord, Andrew Whiley, John Bezett, Doug Hall, Neville Peat, Andrew Noone, Ruth Stokes
Conversation: OIA Request
Subject: Re: OIA Request
Actually Richard, the Lamborghini has become symbolic of many other very visible excesses, but let us stick to Council issues.
For many years I used to make all the information I had available in very candid discussions with staff, who often then failed to investigate appropriately. Citifleet is a prime example, and this and other examples has taught me that a publicly funded organisation is poorly motivated to investigate itself.
Without my LGOIMA requests the incredibly belated Citifleet ‘investigation’ might never have happened, as it did not happen for over a decade before. Have you counted the cost of that multimillion dollar fraud as a percentage of the cost of processing my LGOIMA requests?
Do you not realise that most of my LGOIMA request arise from questions and allegations from members of the public that I represent?
Even when an internal investigation does prove that for instance over quarter of a million of public funds was paid to a contractor to clear mudtanks and none were cleared, nothing appropriate seems to happen at the DCC without publicity. Hence my now having to get the public involved when things are not sorted internally.
When you claim that needing information “of how the information relates to possible wrong doing” is necessary to get information, this is absurd. It is much easier to simply search ‘Stihl chainsaws’ and forward what DCC files information appears. Similarly a vehicle registration number. Just search the registration number and forward the files – easy, quick, no thinking required, little time wasted considering whether ‘particular staff have been involved in possible wrong doing’ etc.
Why is it that our staff can have all this information, but not want to share it with us the supposed decision makers when we request it?
Answer – information is power – and bureaucracies generally do not want to share it, especially with supposed decision makers.
Don’t you dare suggest that I do not give a toss, as you have no way of knowing the state of my mind or the work that I do, and don’t you dare suggest that my approach has failed to identify fraudulent behaviour, as you similarly do not know what has gone into, for instance, Citifleet, Jacks Point/Luggate, mudtanks, Noble, Town Hall redevelopment, or the almost complete turnover of senior managers at the DCC in the last few years.
I will continue to carry on in the manner I believe to be appropriate, and I do not seek any advice on my manner from of you.
Regards,
Cr. Vandervis
———————————
On 15/09/15 9:48 pm, “Richard Thomson” wrote:
Actually Lee my concern is quite the opposite. If there is fraud taking place I want to see it caught. That is why in the Otago DHB when someone came to me with an anonymous tip off and no evidence to back it I initiated a full investigation within half an hour. And I know what some of the consequences are of taking action. They include having to have endless questioning of your integrity/intelligence/ etc by people such as yourself and your fellow travellers on the likes of What If. You have no idea how terribly amusing it is to regularly be accused, because you did the right thing, of “failing to notice the Lamborghini in the carpark”. Never mind that I never had a carpark so didn’t go in the carpark building, or that the fabled Lamborgini was only owned for a few days. Or indeed, had I gone in the carpark building for a random look around and spotted a Lamborghini I would probably have assumed it belonged to a surgeon anyway. So bearing that personal history in mind here is what really pisses me off.
When you make accusations but when virtually begged to make the information available to the CEO so it can be investigated you respond that the “only way you will be making the information available will be through the pages of the ODT”. As you did at the Audit Committee meeting.
When you put in OIA requests and refuse to give any indication of how the information relates to possible wrong doing. Lets think chain saws here. So in the end the only way the OIA can be responded to is to make general inquiries all over the place thereby pretty much ensuring that if there has been dishonesty the person involved will have plenty of time to bury any evidence.
When you seek “all documentation” about a motor vehicle without giving a toss whether the inquiries around that might harm any investigation if there has been wrong doing because the people responding to the request will have no idea if they are going to tip off unknowingly a suspect.
It ought to be of some concern to you by now that your methods and approach have failed to catch any fraudulent behaviour but that the methods of Mr McKenzie that you so disparage have caught a number. Perhaps the fact that people do come to you with info might actually result in people being caught if you worked with people instead of carrying on in the manner you do.
R
[contacts deleted]
———————————
From: Lee Vandervis
To: Richard Thomson; Grace Ockwell; Sue Bidrose; Sandy Graham
Cc: Dave Cull; Kate Wilson; Chris Staynes; Jinty MacTavish; David Benson-Pope; Hilary Calvert; Aaron Hawkins; Mike Lord; Andrew Whiley; John Bezett; Doug Hall; Neville Peat; Andrew Noone
Sent: Tuesday, 15 September 2015 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: OIA Request
Re: OIA Request
I note Richard, that you and some others are quite happy to get on with running a city without knowing who is stealing what or how much things cost to run the city.
My regular voting against Council spending motions often arises because there is simply not enough information made available to justify voting for.
If staff reports provided adequate relevant information, and if rate-paid reports like the $300,000 Deloitte investigation information were made available to us who need to make related decisions, none of this tedious LGOIMA process would be necessary. It is a shame that I have to go to so much effort just get basic information, and that so few others can be bothered.
Cr. Vandervis
———————————
On 15/09/15 5:27 pm, “Richard Thomson” wrote:
Hi,
Could I please file an official information act request asking what the cost to Council has been of answering Cr Vandervis’s official information act requests over the last year.
on second thoughts, please don’t. I’d prefer you got on with running a city..
R
[contacts deleted]
—— End of Forwarded Message
—
Received from Lee Vandervis
Wed, 16 Sep 2015 at 9:27 p.m.
█ Message: And this…
—
—— Forwarded Message
From: Lee Vandervis
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:50:07 +1200
To: David Benson-Pope, Richard Thomson, Grace Ockwell, Sue Bidrose, Sandy Graham
Cc: Dave Cull, Kate Wilson, Chris Staynes, Jinty MacTavish, Hilary Calvert, Aaron Hawkins, Mike Lord, Andrew Whiley, John Bezett, Doug Hall, Neville Peat, Andrew Noone
Conversation: OIA Request
Subject: Re: OIA Request
You might well have stopped for a moment David, to consider the cost of not making LGOIMA requests, or of the enormous savings to ratepayers had LGOIMA requests been honestly and promptly complied with as required by the LGOIMA Act.
It has been recently proven that ex CEO Harland misled Councillors making LGOIMA requests to find out what Farry and Co were up to with Stadium planning/funding, by falsely claiming that the Carisbrook Stadium Trust were not subject to LGOIMA information disclosure requirements. Ex-CEO Harland did this despite having two legal opinions, one local and one ex Wellington, saying that the CST were absolutely subject to LGOIMA information requests. Harland’s deceptions have only come to light as a result of many subsequent LGOIMA requests.
Had Harland processed LGOIMA requests as legally required during his tenure it would highly likely have saved ratepayers many millions in a variety of areas, if not hundreds of millions wasted on our Stadium liability.
If all my 2011 LGOIMA requests for Citifleet information, including all credit card information had been made available as requested under LGOIMA, think how many subsequently stolen vehicles would have been saved and perhaps even the life of a bent manager. Put a price on that David and make sure to request the full cost thereof.
The horrendous cost of not having required relevant information on which to make decisions is the reason we have LGOIMA.
In my opinion, not using the LGOIMA process suggests that you are not doing your job as an elected representative.
Regards,
Cr. Lee Vandervis
———————————
On 15/09/15 6:04 pm, “David Benson-Pope” wrote:
While I agree with the sentiment … If he won’t I wil
This is therefore a request for full details of all lgoima requests made to the dcc by any councillor in the current triennium and the full cost thereof
Yours etc
David Benson-Pope
Sent from my Windows Phone
———————————
From: Richard Thomson
Sent: 15/09/2015 5:27 p.m.
To: Grace Ockwell; Sue Bidrose; Sandy Graham
Cc: Dave Cull; Kate Wilson; Chris Staynes; Lee Vandervis; Jinty MacTavish; David Benson-Pope; Hilary Calvert; Aaron Hawkins; Mike Lord; Andrew Whiley; John Bezett; Doug Hall; Neville Peat; Andrew Noone
Subject: OIA Request
Hi,
Could I please file an official information act request asking what the cost to Council has been of answering Cr Vandervis’s official information act requests over the last year.
on second thoughts, please don’t. I’d prefer you got on with running a city.
R
[contacts deleted]
—— End of Forwarded Message
—
Posted by Elizabeth Kerr
*Image: toonpool.com – Cat Whisperer by Goodwyn (tweaked by whatifdunedin)
Like this:
Like Loading...
File photo [via Newshub]
Mikala Stokes seemed younger than her 21 years in the witness stand.
Ihaka’s mother Mikala Stokes leaves the High Court at Christchurch.
Cameron Ellen, right, carries his son Ihaka Stokes’s coffin at his funeral in 2015. The 14-month-old was murdered by Troy Taylor (in purple, centre), the then partner of his mother Mikala Stokes (obscured, behind Ellen).
Mikala Stokes and Troy Taylor together at Ihaka’s funeral.
![rebecca and mad hatter cull with black power menber parts 1 and 2 [371100] Douglas Field 16.12.15 (1)](https://dunedinstadium.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/rebecca-and-mad-hatter-cull-with-black-power-menber-parts-1-and-2-371100-douglas-field-16-12-15-11.jpg)
![man-with-lawn-mower [lantapix via 123rf.com] 1](https://dunedinstadium.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/man-with-lawn-mower-lantapix-via-123rf-com-11.jpg)
![blackpower2 [3news.co.nz] 1](https://dunedinstadium.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/blackpower2-3news-co-nz-1.jpg)
![DCC vehicles [Photo by RNZ Ian Telfer]](https://dunedinstadium.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/dcc-vehicles-photo-by-rnz-ian-telfer.jpg)
![Cat Whisperer by Goodwyn [www.toonpool.com] tweaked 1](https://dunedinstadium.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/cat-whisperer-by-goodwyn-www-toonpool-com-tweaked-1.jpg)
![Ivy 1 [galleryhip.com]](https://dunedinstadium.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/ivy-1-galleryhip-com.jpg)
![SFO Economic Crime [RNZ graphic]](https://dunedinstadium.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/sfo-economic-crime-rnz-graphic.png)
What if? Dunedin... 