Updated post
Thu, 7 Jul 2016 at 5:45 p.m. [link to peer reviews via LGOIMA]
—
And where are the Opus International ‘peer reviews’ for public scrutiny.
All we have is the self-congratulatory propaganda from DCC and the motley crew, propagated by friends at ODT.
Flood review clears DCC staff findings
SHAME
We hear from inside DCC that the peer reviews are not up to much.
Opus, you say?
Hmm.
News. Farce. Like an incessant rash.
Reasons for political Removal.
—
Posted by Elizabeth Kerr
Election Year. This post is offered in the public interest.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Filed under Business, Climate change, DCC, Democracy, District Plan, Dunedin, Economics, Finance, Geography, Health, Heritage, Housing, Infrastructure, Media, Name, New Zealand, OAG, Ombudsman, People, Politics, Project management, Property, Proposed 2GP, Public interest, Resource management, South Dunedin, Town planning, Transportation, Travesty, What stadium
Tagged as 3 June 2015 Flood, Accountability, Affected parties, Business, Certainty, Civil Defence, Coastal property, Community organisations, Community wellbeing, Council budgets, Democracy, Disaster recovery, District Plan, Dunedin, Dunedin City District Plan, Education, Emergency plan, Flood event, Flood prevention, Flooding, GP, Hazard zones, Housing, Infrastructure, Infrastructure upgrades, Property values, Public consultation, Public Meeting, Renewals, Second generation district plan (2GP), South Dunedin, South Dunedin Action Group, Three waters strategy, Transparency, Wellbeing
What if? Dunedin... 